Saugatuck + Douglas...We're Better Together!
  • Latest News
  • Endorsements
    • Holland Sentinel
    • State Boundary Commission
    • West Michigan Policy Forum
    • Steve Laughner, Owner, The Pines Motor Lodge
    • Paul Marineau, Former Douglas Mayor Pro Tem
    • Judge Richard A. Shaw
    • Henry Van Singel, Saugatuck Councilman
    • John Porzondek, Saugatuck Councilman
    • Saugatuck Officials Endorse Consolidation Study!
  • 48 Rumors
    • 1. "If it ain't broke."
    • 2. Zoning
    • 3. "Outsiders"
    • 4. Cost-Effectiveness
    • 5. City Services
    • 6. Post Office-1
    • 7. Cost
    • 8. Community Identity
    • 9. Property Taxes
    • 10. Plante Moran
    • 11. Rushing things?
    • 12. "We're different."
    • 13. Cost Savings
    • 14. Financial Studies
    • 15. "Cram down our throats"
    • 16. Singapore Dunes
    • 17. Iron River-1
    • 18. Saugatuck Debt
    • 19. Iron River-2
    • 20. Government Efficiency
    • 21. Government Studies
    • 22. Inflated Savings?
    • 23. Joint Planning Commission
    • 24. Opposition
    • 25. "Government Buy-In"
    • 26. Right-Sizing
    • 27. "What's Best"
    • 28. Bigger Government-1
    • 29. City Hall
    • 30. Voter Support
    • 31. Limited Support
    • 32. Emails Uncovered
    • 33. Public Response
    • 34. Saving Our Harbor
    • 35. Consolidated Services
    • 36. New City Charter
    • 37. Press Release
    • 38. Post Office-2
    • 39. Bigger Government-2
    • 40. Commissioner Priebe
    • 41. Increased staff?
    • 42. Business Support
    • 43. Un-Done
    • 44. Zip Code
    • 45. Not necessary
    • 46. State leaders support
    • 47. Experts
    • 48. Driver's Licenses
  • CGC Info
    • Origins
    • Members
    • Resources
    • Our Slogan
    • Our Ads
  • Cost-Savings Studies
    • "Eleven-City" Comparison Study, June 6, 2012, Plante Moran
    • "Zero-Based Org Chart" Study, June 11, 2012, Plante Moran
    • City Financial Data
    • What could be done with the savings?
  • Editorials
    • "Want smaller government?"-2/24/13
    • "Eight suggestions for Douglas"-1/14/13
    • "Three cheers for Douglas!"-1/8/13
    • "There's no reason for confusion"-12/18/12
    • "To tell the truth"-11/28/12
    • "Who'll go first?"-11/21/12
    • "Don't let the people vote!"-6/21/12
    • "What are they afraid of?" -5/25/12
  • Editorial Cartoons
  • Property-Tax Facts
    • Property-Tax Savings Potential
    • Saugatuck Road Debt
  • Fun Videos
  • Information Links
    • Clippings>
      • More Clippings
      • National + Regional Press
    • Downloadable Reports
    • Boundary Commission Proceedings>
      • CGC Responds to SBC October 10, 2012 Ruling
      • CGC Statement to the SBC-October 10, 2012
      • CGC Remarks to the SBC, June 20, 2012: The case for consolidation
      • CGC Rebuttal Remarks
      • Important Statement from the CGC Chairman
  • Contact Us
Released to the press, June 6, 2012

Study: Consolidation Savings at Least $500,000 a Year

A half-million dollars every year.  That’s the minimum cost-savings projection should Saugatuck and Douglas consolidate their two separate governments into one, according to an eleven-city study of 2009-2011 municipal financial data released today by the Consolidated Government Committee.  

To facilitate thorough and reliable comparisons, the highly-regarded Southfield, Michigan-based accounting firm, Plante Moran, which conducted the effort on the CGC’s behalf, identified eleven peer cities with similar populations to a combined Douglas and Saugatuck.  To further enhance comparability, the eleven peers also had to be Lower Michigan Home Rule cities, and be located on or near the shoreline of one of the Great Lakes.  

The cities that met these requirements were New Buffalo, Bridgman, Watervliet, Whitehall, Montague, Ferrysburg, Hart, Charlevoix, East Jordan, Sandusky, and Harbor Beach. Of course, none of these is identical to Saugatuck Douglas, but as a group, they offer the best opportunity to assess comparable government costs.

To establish a minimum cost-savings estimate, the effort focused only on “municipal overhead” expense.  These expenses are presently duplicated in Saugatuck and Douglas. Overhead was defined as the two accounting categories: “general government” expense and “community and economic development” expense. 

The source for all the financial data analyzed was the yearly statewide “F65 filings” required of every municipality and school district by the Michigan Department of Treasury.  For the purposes of this analysis, it was assumed the only source of savings would be municipal overhead.  Thus, no cost-savings at all from any other expense category such as public works, buildings and grounds, parks and recreation, debt service, and other commissions were included, even though some savings in these other expense categories following consolidation would be virtually inevitable.  The savings projected, then, represent a legitimate minimum number arrived at using the most conservative analysis.

The average annual municipal overhead expense for the peer-group cities over the three-year period was $541,499. The combined Douglas and Saugatuck three-year average annual expense was more than double at $1,191,498.

Picture
Plante Moran concluded: “We believe that it is very reasonable for the combined overhead costs of a consolidated Saugatuck-Douglas city to approximate the average of this group of 11 peers.  This equates to a conservative savings estimate in excess of $500,000, or $250 per resident, every year.”

Commenting on the study, CGC chairman, Travis Randolph, said, “Freeing up a minimum of a half-million dollars every year to lower property taxes, invest in our community, or some combination of both would be a big deal.  It’s a pretty compelling argument for consolidation.”

A copy of the full Plante Moran study findings can be found immediately below.  


Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture