Saugatuck + Douglas...We're Better Together!
  • Latest News
  • Endorsements
    • Holland Sentinel
    • State Boundary Commission
    • West Michigan Policy Forum
    • Steve Laughner, Owner, The Pines Motor Lodge
    • Paul Marineau, Former Douglas Mayor Pro Tem
    • Judge Richard A. Shaw
    • Henry Van Singel, Saugatuck Councilman
    • John Porzondek, Saugatuck Councilman
    • Saugatuck Officials Endorse Consolidation Study!
  • 48 Rumors
    • 1. "If it ain't broke."
    • 2. Zoning
    • 3. "Outsiders"
    • 4. Cost-Effectiveness
    • 5. City Services
    • 6. Post Office-1
    • 7. Cost
    • 8. Community Identity
    • 9. Property Taxes
    • 10. Plante Moran
    • 11. Rushing things?
    • 12. "We're different."
    • 13. Cost Savings
    • 14. Financial Studies
    • 15. "Cram down our throats"
    • 16. Singapore Dunes
    • 17. Iron River-1
    • 18. Saugatuck Debt
    • 19. Iron River-2
    • 20. Government Efficiency
    • 21. Government Studies
    • 22. Inflated Savings?
    • 23. Joint Planning Commission
    • 24. Opposition
    • 25. "Government Buy-In"
    • 26. Right-Sizing
    • 27. "What's Best"
    • 28. Bigger Government-1
    • 29. City Hall
    • 30. Voter Support
    • 31. Limited Support
    • 32. Emails Uncovered
    • 33. Public Response
    • 34. Saving Our Harbor
    • 35. Consolidated Services
    • 36. New City Charter
    • 37. Press Release
    • 38. Post Office-2
    • 39. Bigger Government-2
    • 40. Commissioner Priebe
    • 41. Increased staff?
    • 42. Business Support
    • 43. Un-Done
    • 44. Zip Code
    • 45. Not necessary
    • 46. State leaders support
    • 47. Experts
    • 48. Driver's Licenses
  • CGC Info
    • Origins
    • Members
    • Resources
    • Our Slogan
    • Our Ads
  • Cost-Savings Studies
    • "Eleven-City" Comparison Study, June 6, 2012, Plante Moran
    • "Zero-Based Org Chart" Study, June 11, 2012, Plante Moran
    • City Financial Data
    • What could be done with the savings?
  • Editorials
    • "Want smaller government?"-2/24/13
    • "Eight suggestions for Douglas"-1/14/13
    • "Three cheers for Douglas!"-1/8/13
    • "There's no reason for confusion"-12/18/12
    • "To tell the truth"-11/28/12
    • "Who'll go first?"-11/21/12
    • "Don't let the people vote!"-6/21/12
    • "What are they afraid of?" -5/25/12
  • Editorial Cartoons
  • Property-Tax Facts
    • Property-Tax Savings Potential
    • Saugatuck Road Debt
  • Fun Videos
  • Information Links
    • Clippings>
      • More Clippings
      • National + Regional Press
    • Downloadable Reports
    • Boundary Commission Proceedings>
      • CGC Responds to SBC October 10, 2012 Ruling
      • CGC Statement to the SBC-October 10, 2012
      • CGC Remarks to the SBC, June 20, 2012: The case for consolidation
      • CGC Rebuttal Remarks
      • Important Statement from the CGC Chairman
  • Contact Us
Picture
From the website of the group opposing consolidation: 
Picture
Fact:   The group's assertion is complete fiction.  The Consolidated Government Committee never issued a press release on the Haworth decision to close their Douglas plant or ever "... claim that Haworth Corporation is closing it's (sic) Douglas plant because the two cities are not consolidated."  Once again, the irresponsible rumor-creators have chosen to make something up, and then try and pin it on the folks supporting consolidation.  The CGC believes the consolidation discussion in our community is too important to deal in unsavory, made-up smears, and outright lies.  Those who deal in such disrespectful tactics should be ashamed of themselves.
- Update, January 17, 2013:  The above article (green text) has been removed from the opposing group's website without explanation or apology.

- Second update, January 28, 2013: This "minor correction" appears on the opposing group's "new website."
Picture
The letter to the editor referenced, however, did not in fact "essentially claim the Haworth plant was closing due to a lack of consolidation."  What was stated was that Haworth and others faced the challenge of a "lack of a unified economic-development team in  our community...."  which is a factual statement.  No cause-and-effect was posited.  Here is the full text of the letter to the editor:
Picture